翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Omphalomia hirta
・ Omphalopappus
・ Omphalophana
・ Omphalophana anatolica
・ Omphalophana antirrhinii
・ Omphalophana durnalayana
・ Omphalophana pauli
・ Omphalophana serrata
・ Omphalophana serrulata
・ Omphalophloios
・ Omphalophobia
・ Omphalophora
・ Omphalora
・ Omphalorissa purchasi
・ Omphalos
Omphalos (book)
・ Omphalos (disambiguation)
・ Omphalos (film)
・ Omphalos hypothesis
・ Omphalos of Delphi
・ Omphalosaurus
・ Omphaloscelis
・ Omphaloscelis polybela
・ Omphaloskepsis
・ Omphalota chlorobasis
・ Omphalotrochidae
・ Omphalotropis
・ Omphalotropis albocarinata
・ Omphalotropis carolinensis
・ Omphalotropis cheynei


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Omphalos (book) : ウィキペディア英語版
Omphalos (book)

''Omphalos: An Attempt to Untie the Geological Knot'' is a book by Philip Gosse, written in 1857 (two years before Darwin's ''On the Origin of Species''), in which he argues that the fossil record is not evidence of evolution, but rather that it is an act of creation inevitably made so that the world would appear to be older than it is. The reasoning parallels the reasoning that Gosse chose to explain why Adam (who would have had no mother) had a navel: Though Adam would have had no need of a navel, God gave him one anyway to give him the appearance of having a human ancestry. Thus, the name of the book, ''Omphalos'', which means 'navel' in Greek.
Darwin is mentioned several times within the book, but always with considerable respect. Gosse had attended meetings at the Royal Society where evolutionary theory was tested by Darwin before the publication of ''Origin''—and had even made similar observations himself about variation of species in his own studies into marine biology—and considered Darwin's reasoning scientifically sound.
==Synopsis==
The book was precised by his son Edmund Gosse:
:Life is a circle, no one stage of which more than any other affords a natural commencing-point. Every living object has an omphalos, or an egg, or a seed, which points irresistibly to the existence of a previous living object of the same kind. Creation, therefore, must mean the sudden bursting into the circle, and its phenomena, produced full grown by the arbitrary will of God, would certainly present the stigmata of a pre-existent existence. Each created tree would display the marks of sloughed bark and fallen leaves, though it had never borne those leaves or that bark. The teeth of each brute would be worn away with exercise which it had never taken. By innumerable examples he shows that this must have been the case with all living forms. If so, then why may not the fossils themselves be part of this breaking into the circle ? Why may not the strata, with their buried fauna and flora, belong to the general scheme of the prochronic development of the plan of the life-history of this globe?

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Omphalos (book)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.